Starting with 2.0b4 Embperl introduces the concept of recipes. A recipe basically
tells Embperl how a component should be build. While before 2.0b4 you could
have only one processor that works on the request (the Embperl processor -
you're also able to define different syntaxes), now you can have multiple of them
arranged in a pipeline or even a tree. While you are able to give the full
recipe when calling Execute, this is not very convenient, so normally you
will only give the name of a recipe, either as parameter 'recipe' to
Execute or as EMBPERL_RECIPE in your httpd.conf. Of course you can have
different recipes for different locations and/or files. A recipe is constructed
out of providers. A provider can either be read from some source or do some
processing on a source. There is no restriction on what sort of data a provider
has as in- and output - you just have to make sure that output format of
a provider matches the input format of the next provider. In the current
implementation Embperl comes with a set of built-in providers: | file | | read file data | | | memory | | get data from a scalar | | | epparse | | parse file into a Embperl tree structure | | | epcompile | | compile Embperl tree structure | | | eprun | | execute Embperl tree structure | | | eptostring | | convert Embperl tree structure to string | | | libxslt-parse-xml | | parse xml source for libxslt | | | libxslt-compile-xsl | | parse and compile stylesheet for libxslt | | | libxslt | | do an xsl transformation via libxslt | | | xalan-parse-xml | | parse xml source for xalan | | | xalan-compile-xsl | | parse and compile stylesheet for xalan | | | xalan | | do an xsl transformation via xalan | |
There is a C interface, so new custom providers can be written, but what makes it
really useful is that the next release of Embperl will contain a
Perl interface, so you can write your own providers in Perl. The default recipe is named Embperl and contains the following providers: +-----------+
+ file +
+-----------+
|
v
+-----------+
+ epparse +
+-----------+
|
v
+-----------+
+ epcompile +
+-----------+
|
v
+-----------+
+ eprun +
+-----------+ This cause Embperl to behave like it has done in the past, when no
recipes existed. Each intermediate result could be cached. So for example you are able
to cache the already parsed XML or compiled stylesheet in memory,
without the need to reparse/recompile it over and over again. Another nice thing about recipes is that they are not static. A recipe
is defined by a recipe object. When a request comes in, Embperl calls
the get_recipe method of the application object, which by default
calls the get_recipe of the named recipe object, which should return a array
that describes what Embperl has to do. The get_recipe methods can of course
build the array dynamically, looking, for example, at the request parameters
like filename, formvalues, mime type or whatever. For example if you
give a scalar as input the Embperl recipe replaces the file provider
with a memory provider. Additionally you can specify more then one
recipe (separated by spaces). Embperl will call all the new methods in
turn until the first one that returns undef. This way you can create recipes
that are known for what they are responsible. One possibility would be
to check the file extension and only return the recipe if it matches.
Much more sophisticated things are possible... See perldoc Embperl::Recipe for how to create your own provider.
|